koyamacchi replied to your post: koyamacchi replied to your post: koyamacchi…
SHIGE WILL ONLY ACCEPT THIS IF YOU CAN TELL ME THE ANSWER TO 5 + 4 * 0IS IT 5
OR ARE YOU PULLING SOME DEGREE-LEVEL CALCULUS THAT I JUST DON’T RECOGNISE OUT ON ME
Okay here we go
5 + 4 * 0
Could be
5 + (4 * 0)
OR
(5 + 4) * 0
Now, we can’t multiply by zero, so we abstract that anything multiplied by zero is zero.
But if we assume
5 + (4 * 0)
5 + (0)
5
And if we assume
(5 + 4) * 0
(9) * 0
0
The whole thing needs to be elaborated on seriously.
(Source: gayoak)
-
reardenindustries reblogged this from xtremecaffeine and added:
Sorry to interrupt, but BODMAS tho, so it’s 5.
-
j-sillabub reblogged this from xtremecaffeine and added:
If I understand BODMAS correctly then it should be 5… I think…
-
xtremecaffeine reblogged this from gayoak and added:
Okay here we go 5 + 4 * Could be 5 + (4 * 0) OR (5 + 4) * Now, we can’t multiply by zero, so we abstract that anything...
-
koyamacchi likes this
-
koyamacchi said:
NO NO IT’S NOT CALCULUS, & YES, CONGRATULATIONS THE ANSWER IS INDEED 5 *APPLAUDS* OK OK I AM SENDING SHIGE
-
gayoak posted this