yadirtyshisno:

(Pulled out of my ass in two seconds)
Because

yadirtyshisno:

(Pulled out of my ass in two seconds)

Because

(Source: goteamgents, via zellas)

lightspeedsound:

LOL so side note from all this election biznatch on my dash

but like I was catching up with this friend from high school

who was telling me about this simple bitch that we both ended up hating (I forget why he ended up hating her; I ended up hating her cos this ugly white bitch thought I was hitting on her all the time and she outed me to the entire [very homophobic] school by saying I was “creeping on her.” And then she never apologized and, to this day, still maintains I wanted her [very undesirable] body. Yeah. Gross. Fuck.]

So anyways, this simple white bitch, right? She went to my school. She was…well, very simple, very white, very much a dumb bitch.

So like the Dean of our (very racist, very homphobic, very southern) high school was this awesome chill Black dude who was forever trying to wake us up to social injustices (because, hey, privileged white southern kids don’t give a shit unless it pops up on twitter).

So then like he showed “A Time for Burning” which is this documentary about racism in the 1960s in Nebraska. It’s all about these white church leaders trying to be all like “reach out to the poor Black people” and the church members being like “fuck no you are insane.” Essentially. I’m paraphrasing here. 

Anyways, this simple white bitch right?

She ACTUALLY PROTESTS SHOWING THIS FILM.

Not for any sort of trigger warning for the few Black kids.

Oh no.

She protests it, because “it NEGATIVELY PORTRAYS SOUTHERN WHITE CHRISTIANS AND WAS PROBABLY CUT TOGETHER TO MAKE THEM SOUND MORE RACIST.”

Because apparently history is too painful for you to view and even if the library of freakin’ Congress says the film has historical value, it’s way easier for white southern christians to deny documented reality than it is to accept the fact that they’ve done wrong.

…and anyways, I just wanted to tell this story because it reminds me of all the shit people have been saying about Obama, and how it’s so racist, that Black people only vote for him to be Black, and think that somehow there’s this POC conspiracy to hate all white people.

When it’s like, um, no, it’s because THERE WAS, IS, AND WILL BE a conspiracy to treat POCs like shit in this country and then deny it.

Learn your history.

Admit it.

White people are fucking assholes when they’re in power.

Now let’s get on to changing that. 

kthx. 

stfuconservatives:

reallyfoxnews:

Essentially.

LOOK IT UP!!!

stfuconservatives:

reallyfoxnews:

Essentially.

LOOK IT UP!!!

(Source: veganaction)

After elections, Greece's Jews come to terms with neo-Nazi triumph

5feet12inches:

EXCERPT:

Greece’s Jewish community on Monday sent its members a laconic, factual e-mail. Without any interpretive adornment, the message conveyed a few dry facts. In elections staged on Sunday, the Golden Dawn neo-Nazi party won 7 percent of the country’s popular vote - a tally twice the minimum threshold level required to send representatives to parliament.

The update also included information about districts in which Jews live, and also biographies of the delegates that the far-right party will send to parliament. All told, Golden Dawn will have 21 parliament seats out of 300.

(Source: verbalresistance)

Mitt Romney: I Can Relate To Black People, My Ancestors Once Owned Slaves

wtfwhiteprivilege:

I understand how difficult it can be for an African-American in today’s society. In fact, I can relate to black people very well indeed. My ancestors once owned slaves, and it is in my lineage to work closely with the black community. However, just because they were freed over a century ago doesn’t mean they can now be freeloaders. They need to be told to work hard, and the incentives just aren’t there for them anymore. When I’m president I plan to work closely with the black community to bring a sense of pride and work ethic back into view for them. 

This is a fucking joke, right? 

Question for liberals reply

stfuconservatives:

thetruthisouttheree:

Alright, thanks for the replies everyone. Didn’t mean to make you all mad, I just wanted to understand the liberal side. I’m cool with welfare for families that need it and are actively seeking work. I know the requirements, but it is an easy system to corrupt. Forget about statistics here because you can’t gather this kind. Use common sense- Don’t you think it’s the least bit odd that you have to get drug tests to have a job in this country, but not to collect money from those who have jobs and contribute to society? Seriously, I’d be fine with helping people who are not doing drugs. I admire the trust in this “honor system,” but wouldn’t it make all the sense in the world to require drug tests on the unemployed who go on welfare.

As far as OWS goes, I’m all for exercising democratic rights. However, this has gone too far. You might want to check this out- http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-01-29/occupy-oakland-protests/52871646/1. I’m sure that not all protesters use drugs, burn our flag, and assault people. But it’s disturbing how many are, and getting away with it.

Also, corporations create jobs and run this country. Attacking them and being paranoid about “lobbying” is just silly and un- American. Capitalism runs on competition and these corporations create global competitiveness and American superiority across the world. Why do people have a problem with our politicians helping them out? So what, they get paid. Good for them! It’s not undermining democracy at all. Corporations are made up of people, and those people are the ones helping our economy. We must get work ethic back in America because this system has always worked until this current epidemic of laziness and entitlement sense.

As far as poor people helping themselves, that’s not what I said at all. I think we the people must take responsibility and help them, apart from the government. My family is active in helping the poor. My parents donate to many charities and we help the poor through my volunteer activities, such as homeless shelters. This is actually caring for the poor. Unlike big government help, with its many opportunities for corruption, it’s actually showing them love as opposed to forced giving.

I’m just going to focus real quick on the part I bolded. This, folks, is spoon-fed conservative nonsense. OP, you asked liberals to explain corruption. But corporations paying politicians to look out for their special interests is just “creating competition”? And questioning that is UN-AMERICAN? Gee, I wonder why people say Republicans don’t care about poor people!

For real though. Having social programs (which every first-world nation has, including the ones with better economies than ours) is creating an “epidemic of laziness and entitlement” but openly supporting candidates who will let you pay less in taxes is just how capitalism works? Seriously? Seriously? Are you even listening to yourself?

Take your own advice and use a little common sense. Do you think we should drug test every person who gets tax breaks? Every person who uses public schools and parks and sidewalks? No? Then why should we only drug test poor people who use “taxpayer money”? HMMMM.

I love your “well you can’t gather statistics on this stuff” line. Actually you can! In Florida, when they started drug-testing welfare recipients, less than 2% of them failed. That’s lower than than the average level of drug use in our country, period. That’s not common sense — that’s reality. The truth has a liberal bias.

-Jess

(via stfuconservatives)



(via squeetothegee-deactivated201111)