CreepShots Is Back and Impersonating Lesbians

everythingbutharleyquinn:

You can take r/CreepShots out of Reddit, but you unsurprisingly can’t stop Redditors from coming up with disgusting new ways to fetishize non-consent. A tipster from the subreddit r/actuallesbiansalerted us to two new creepshot forums, in which moderators are not only posting photos of unsuspecting women but mocking the LGBTQ community at the same time.

There’s r/CandidFashionPolice, where “people post candid photos of women and then we judge their fashion choices similar to TLC’s what not to wear” and posters are instructed to “speak like a sassy Diva when commenting or posting.”

We won’t link directly to the photos, but it’s very,very clear that they’re creepshots in disguise as “flamboyant gay guys.”

Many of the exact same photos are on r/Cshots as well, along with headlines like “Fellow lesbian eating pussy at a strip club parking lot. Mmm, I wish she was eating my c*nt.” The photos wouldn’t be okay if they were posted by lesbians — or if they were really posted by fashion-obsessed gay dudes — but according to r/actuallesbians and our source, that’s not the case, as evidenced by the moderators with titles like “Women’s Rights Activist” and “Women’s Shelter Employee.” (Look, notorious troll/CreepShot fan POTATO_IN_MY_ANUS is one, too!)

gross. gross. gross.

(Source: dykesanddykery, via annehka)

fucknomisogynymastodon:

BECAUSE ALL FEMINISTS ARE HYPOCRITAL GOLD-DIGGERS AMIRITE

fucknomisogynymastodon:

BECAUSE ALL FEMINISTS ARE HYPOCRITAL GOLD-DIGGERS AMIRITE

(Source: )

(Source: )

payface:

lilacfawn:

16 Quotes From Tony Abbott to Remind You Why He Shouldn’t Be Prime Minister

everythingbutharleyquinn:

theagevsheraldsun:

winifredjay:

On immigration:

1. ‘Jesus knew that there was a place for everything and it’s not necessarily everyone’s place to come to Australia.’

2. ‘These people aren’t so much seeking asylum, they’re seeking permanent residency. If they were happy with temporary protection visas, then they might be able to argue better that they were asylum seekers’

On rights at work:

3. ‘Bad bosses, like bad fathers and husbands, should be tolerated because they do more good than harm’

On women:

4. ‘The problem with the Australian practice of abortion is that an objectively grave matter has been reduced to a question of the mother’s convenience.’

5. ‘I think it would be folly to expect that women will ever dominate or even approach equal representation in a large number of areas simply because their aptitudes, abilities and interests are different for physiological reasons’

6. ‘I think there does need to be give and take on both sides, and this idea that sex is kind of a woman’s right to absolutely withhold, just as the idea that sex is a man’s right to demand I think they are both they both need to be moderated, so to speak’

7. ‘What the housewives of Australia need to understand as they do the ironing is that if they get it done commercially it’s going to go up in price and their own power bills when they switch the iron on are going to go up, every year…’

On Julia Gillard:

8. ‘Gillard won’t lie down and die’

On climate change:

9. ‘Climate change is absolute crap’

10. ‘If you want to put a price on carbon why not just do it with a simple tax.’

On homosexuality:

11. ‘I’d probably … I feel a bit threatened’

12. ‘If you’d asked me for advice I would have said to have – adopt a sort of “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy about all of these things…’

On Indigenous Australia:

13. ‘Now, I know that there are some Aboriginal people who aren’t happy with Australia Day. For them it remains Invasion Day. I think a better view is the view of Noel Pearson, who has said that Aboriginal people have much to celebrate in this country’s British Heritage’

14. ‘Western civilisation came to this country in 1788 and I’m proud of that…’

15. ‘There may not be a great job for them but whatever there is, they just have to do it, and if it’s picking up rubbish around the community, it just has to be done’

On Nicola Roxon:

16: ‘That’s bullshit. You’re being deliberately unpleasant. I suppose you can’t help yourself, can you?’

Read this very carefully, Australia.

please please don’t vote for him

Every country has their asshole
and this is ours. 

(via driftingfocus)

Follow up post re: MRAs and Family Law/Parenting

face-down-asgard-up:

I left a big point out in my previous post, mostly because I was blogging from work ( shhh! don’t tell. ).

When MRAs starting talking about father’s rights, family law reform, etc. I want you to pay special attention to the things they say. You will notice a theme.

The theme is: controlling women. MRAs don’t really want improved parental rights. What they want is another way to control and victimize women. I have seen these discussions over and over again.

Every time some bro whines because “What if I want to be a dad and she wants an abortion? I should be able to have a say!” What this translates to is, “I don’t care what she wants. I don’t care about her body, health, or life. I care about being able to force my wants on her.”

Then there are those that will say, “Well, I’ll take her to court if she won’t let me X, Y, Z when it comes to my kid!” What this translates to is, “I can’t be a mature adult and suggest we try to settle this dispute amicably. Instead, I will threaten her with expensive legal action that will take time away from her job and life.”

All of this talk about how it’s so unfair that a woman ( sorry that this is ciscentric. Not only women can have children. ) can decide to abort or that a woman is receiving child support payments. All of it is really buttfrustrated sexist, misogynistic little assholes upset over the fact that they can’t control a woman’s choices. So they use threats, emotional blackmail, unnecessary legal action, and other means to desperately try and control these women who DARE to try have some control over their own lives and the lives of their children.

Rarely do I see MRAs talking about the kids in these situations. It’s ALWAYS about how unfair things are for men and what horrible, trickster, lying bitches women are.

That’s how you can tell that MRAs don’t really care about this shit. Because they don’t even address the real issue: Being a parent means making the best decision for your child, even if it’s something that you don’t want to do.  And threatening to use your children to hurt the other parent is always shitty and always the sign of someone who doesn’t really give a shit about their children’s quality of life.

(Source: shannibal-cannibal, via rabbleprochoice)

When I say I’m pro-life…

stfuconservatives:

panda-mo:

desliz:

speakfortheweak:

It doesn’t mean I’m religious.
Because I’m not.

It doesn’t mean I hate LGBT community.
Because I am a supporter.

It doesn’t mean I force women to give birth.
Because I never will.

Take what you want from my blog, but never assume I’m just your stereotypical pro-lifer. It is VERY possible to ask questions, state your opinions in a civil manner on this blog. I am respectful and I enjoy answering all questions received! 

Thanks for following! :)
-speakfortheweak 

Let me tell you some things.

I used to investigate child abuse and neglect. I can tell you how to stop the vast majority of abortion in the world.

First, make knowledge and access to contraception widely available. Start teaching kids before they hit puberty. Teach them about domestic violence and coercion, and teach them not to coerce and rape. Create a strong, loving community where women and girls feel safe and supported in times of need. Because guess what? They aren’t. You know what happens to babies born under such circumstances? They get hurt, unnecessarily. They get sick, unnecessarily. They get removed from parents who love them but who are unprepared for the burden of a child. Resources? Honey, we try. There aren’t enough resources anywhere. There are waiting lists, and promises, and maybes. If the government itself can’t hook people up, what makes you think an impoverished single mom can handle it?

Abolish poverty. Do you have any idea how much childcare costs? Daycare can cost as much or more than monthly rent. They may be inadequately staffed. Getting a private nanny is a nice idea, but they don’t come cheap either. Relatives? Do they own a car? Does the bus run at the right times? Do they have jobs of their own they need to work just to keep the lights on? Are they going to stick around until you get off you convenience store shift at 4 AM? Do they have criminal histories that will make them unsuitable as caregivers when CPS pokes around? You gonna pay for that? Who’s going to pay for that?

End rape. I know your type errs on the side of blaming the woman, but I’ve seen little girls who’ve barely gotten their periods pregnant because somebody thought raping preteens was an awesome idea. You want to put a child through that? Or someone with a mental or physical inability for whom pregnancy would be frightening, painful or even life-threatening? I’ve seen nonverbal kids who had their feet sliced up by caregivers for no fucking reason at all, you think sexual abuse doesn’t happen either?

You say there’s lots of couples who want to adopt. Kiddo, what they want to adopt are healthy white babies, preferably untainted by the wombs and genetics of women with alcohol or drug dependencies. I’ve seen the kids they don’t want, who almost no one wants. You people focus only on the happy pink babies, the gigglers, the ones who grow and grow with no trouble. Those are not the kids who linger in foster care. Those are certainly not the older kids and teenagers who age out of foster care and then are thrown out in the streets, usually with an array of medical and mental health issues. Are they too old to count?

And yeah, I’ve seen the babies, little hand-sized things barely clinging to life. There’s no glory, no wonder there. There is no wonder in a pregnant woman with five dollars to her name, so deep in depression you wonder if she’ll be alive in a week. Therapy costs money. Medicine costs money. Food, clothes, electricity cost money. Government assistance is a pittance; poverty drives women and girls into situations where they are forced to rely on people who abuse them to survive. (I’ve been up in more hospitals than I can count.)

In each and every dark pit of desperation, I have never seen a pro-lifer. I ain’t never seen them babysitting, scrubbing floors, bringing over goods, handing mom $50 bucks a month or driving her to the pediatrician. I ain’t never seen them sitting up for hours with an autistic child who screams and rages so his mother can get some sleep while she rests up from working 14-hour days. I don’t see them fixing leaks in rundown houses or playing with a kid while the police prepare to interview her about her sexual abuse. They’re not paying for the funerals of babies and children who died after birth, when they truly do become independent organisms. And the crazy thing is they think they’ve already done their job, because the child was born!

Aphids give birth, girl. It’s no miracle. You want to speak for the weak? Get off your high horse and get your hands dirty helping the poor, the isolated, the ill and mentally ill women and mothers and their children who already breathe the dirty air. You are doing nothing, absolutely nothing, for children. You don’t have a flea’s comprehension of injustice. You are not doing shit for life until you get in there and fight that darkness. Until you understand that abortion is salvation in a world like ours. Does that sound too hard? Do you really think suffering post-birth is more permissible, less worthy of outrage?

“Pro-life” is simply a philosophy in which the only life worth saving is the one that can be saved by punishing a woman.

FLAWLESS COMMENTARY ABOVE. COMPLETELY AGREED. I’d love to see speakfortheweak reply to this, though we all know she won’t.

Can’t not reblog this. -Joe

(via 55223311)

"In pop culture, girls who crush hopelessly on guys they can’t have are painted as just that – hopeless. Over and over again, we’re taught that girls who openly express sexual or romantic interest in guys who don’t want them are pitiable, stalkerish, desperate, crazy bitches. More often than not, they’re also portrayed as ugly – whether physically, emotionally or both – in order to further establish their undesirability as an objective fact. Both narratively and, as a consequence, in real life, men are given free reign to snub, abuse, mislead and talk down to such women: we’re raised to believe that female desire is unseemly, so that any consequent shaming is therefore deserved. There is no female-equivalent Friend Zone terminology because, in the language of our culture, a man’s romantic choices are considered sacrosanct and inviolable. If a girl has been told no, then she has only herself to blame for anything that happens next – but if a woman says no, then she must not really mean it. Or, if she does, she shouldn’t: the rejected man is a universally sympathetic figure, and everyone from moviegoers to platonic onlookers will scream at her to justgive him a chance, as though her rejection must always be unfounded rather than based on the fact that he had a chance, and blew it. And even then, give him another one! The pathos of Single Nice Guys can only be eased by pity-sex with unwilling women that blossoms into romance!"

Lamenting the Friendzone, or: The Nice Guy Approach to Perpetuating Sexist Bullshit  (via waschbar)

(Source: fozmeadows, via tophaloaf-deactivated20121112)

Why Guys Really Hate Being Called "Creepy"

kathleenthearsonist:

At the heart of the ‘anti-creep shaming campaign’ is a concerted effort to discourage women from relying on their instincts to protect themselves from harm. Laying aside its likely etymology, calling a dude an ‘asshole’ is a way of labeling him a jerk. Plenty of people can be jerks without being predatory. On the other hand, calling a dude ‘creepy’ labels him as a potential threat; a creep may not be imminently violent, but there’s almost always a sense that he shows consistent disregard for a woman’s physical or psychological space. This is why, as Wakeman wrote, ‘it’s a really freaking dangerous idea to twist a woman’s open, honest communication about her boundaries/expectations into ‘creep shaming’ that victimizes men.’

(via discosherpa)

"What had begun as “race music,” made for and by people as dark as me, had now transferred ownership into the hands of white boys and girls. And even though it was still OK for those same kids to listen to rap and r & b, I was not supposed to be rocking out to their music. Black girls had no place in the rock and roll hierarchy. I knew white men were the guys in charge. That much was clear. Their job was to piss off parents, wear the flashiest outfits, play the hardest riffs, do the hardest drugs and fuck as many (white) girls as possible. Women? They weren’t in the band. They were “with the band.” White girls were groupies who flung panties on stage and gave blowjobs on crowded tour buses. I didn’t know where black girls were supposed to go."

Kristina Gray, “I Sold My Soul to Rock and Roll” (via wretchedoftheearth)

missgingerlee:

aboutmaleprivilege:

Being a stripper and being viewed as a person having harmless fun and making some money at the same time, instead of a stupid trainwreck with daddy problems and no self respect.

Boom. This. Y’all know I railed on the whole ‘Magic Mike’ thing a couple weeks ago for a damn good reason.

Signed,

A female grumpy feminist stripper

(Source: all-about-male-privilege, via kartari)

"A woman’s worst nightmare? That’s pretty easy. Novelist Margaret Atwood writes that when she asked a male friend why men feel threatened by women, he answered, “They are afraid women will laugh at them.” When she asked a group of women why they feel threatened by men, they said, “We’re afraid of being killed.”"

http://www.pbs.org/kued/nosafeplace/articles/nightmare.html (via alullaby)

This reminds me of a discussion we had in school, and one girl was talking about living in fear of her safety because she is a girl, and this guy chimed in and was all “It’s hard for guys too! I’m so awkward around girls! It’s embarrassing!” Yeah, not the same thing, exactly?

(via tulletulle)

This reminds me of an article about online (heterosexual) dating that I read a while ago. It listed men’s and women’s worst fears about meeting someone from online. The highest ranked fear that men had was that their date would be fat, whereas the highest ranked fear that women had was that their date would turn out to be violent and kill them. 

I think that says a lot. 

(via kaitg)

Always reblog. Also, this is the dynamic between most privileged and oppressed groups. I don’t feel like most people understand that.

(via intellectual-stupidity)

(via chauvinistsushi)

schrodingers-kitten:

dizzzypie:

dizzzypie:

wanting to not be held to heteronormative, ciscentric, white supremacist, ableist, fatphobic beauty standards=/=not wanting to be seen as sexy.
wanting to be empowered in your sexuality and not put down for how you look=/=wanting to be seen as a sex object.
As a trans woman this really bugs me, because we are CONSTANTLY objectified and hyper-sexualized or considered unloveable & unfuckable. I don’t want to be objectified (outside of a consensual kink based relationship). I want to be admired. Huge difference. I don’t want my fucking identity fetishized. It’s degrading and dehumanizing.

rebloging myself because important.

antifeminist arguments are hilarious in their utter stupidity

schrodingers-kitten:

dizzzypie:

dizzzypie:


wanting to not be held to heteronormative, ciscentric, white supremacist, ableist, fatphobic beauty standards=/=not wanting to be seen as sexy.

wanting to be empowered in your sexuality and not put down for how you look=/=wanting to be seen as a sex object.

As a trans woman this really bugs me, because we are CONSTANTLY objectified and hyper-sexualized or considered unloveable & unfuckable. I don’t want to be objectified (outside of a consensual kink based relationship). I want to be admired. Huge difference. I don’t want my fucking identity fetishized. It’s degrading and dehumanizing.

rebloging myself because important.

antifeminist arguments are hilarious in their utter stupidity

(Source: liberaldouchegarofalo)

dreams-from-my-father:

everything-is-a-baited-hook:

Women perform 66 percent of the world’s work, produce 50 percent of the food, but earn 10 percent of the income and own 1 percent of the property (UNICEF, ‘Gender Equality – The Big Picture’, 2007.)

Poverty has a woman’s face and that face is definitely that face of a woman of color, not a white woman!!
Seriously, this point is very important and I still do not understand why it is always sidelined. As if our poverty issues were in anyway comparable to women’s in the west. Race plays a major role in the way patriarchal white supremacist capitalism affects us. 
Most food producers in the west are men who have access to the latest technologies, while they are overwhelmingly very poor women in developing countries. This is why, not mentioning race or the developing / developed countries dichotomy makes sentences such as this one “Women […] produce 50 percent of the food” at best a distortion of the truth. 

dreams-from-my-father:

everything-is-a-baited-hook:

Women perform 66 percent of the world’s work, produce 50 percent of the food, but earn 10 percent of the income and own 1 percent of the property (UNICEF, ‘Gender Equality – The Big Picture’, 2007.)

Poverty has a woman’s face and that face is definitely that face of a woman of color, not a white woman!!

Seriously, this point is very important and I still do not understand why it is always sidelined. As if our poverty issues were in anyway comparable to women’s in the west. Race plays a major role in the way patriarchal white supremacist capitalism affects us. 

Most food producers in the west are men who have access to the latest technologies, while they are overwhelmingly very poor women in developing countries. This is why, not mentioning race or the developing / developed countries dichotomy makes sentences such as this one “Women […] produce 50 percent of the food” at best a distortion of the truth. 

If you say that a woman wearing revealing clothes deserves to be sexually assaulted, you are saying that a woman’s body is inherently deserving of rape. That women are inherently deserving of rape. That women have to make sure their body is hidden in order not to deserve to be raped. That is misogyny in its purest form.

danceswithfaeriesunderthemooon:

need this on my blog again because of reasons.

(Source: livefromplanetearth, via maghrabiyya)

liberationista:

melyzzamed:

GoVeg.com

So, can we fight for nonhuman animal liberation without throwing women under the bus, please?
#sosickofmisogynyandsexistimageryintheanimalrightsmovementwhatisintersectionalityidon’tknow

I red that PETA as PUTA.

And the image made a lot more sense that way.

liberationista:

melyzzamed:

GoVeg.com

So, can we fight for nonhuman animal liberation without throwing women under the bus, please?

#sosickofmisogynyandsexistimageryintheanimalrightsmovementwhatisintersectionalityidon’tknow

I red that PETA as PUTA.

And the image made a lot more sense that way.

(Source: intellectualcoitus, via liberationista-deactivated20130)