(Inspired by the commentary on this post)

For the purposes of anti-racism struggles, that’s all you need to go by.

Yes, the term, “colored” is not normally associated with Asian people these days, but it was definitely used to label people of Asian descent in this country in the past. We have been and still are the targets of White racism:

Believing the fallacy that people of Asian descent are not authentically or legitimately ‘Colored’ or ‘People of Color’ is wrong because:

1) It ignores the long history of racial discrimination and persecution of Asians in the U.S. (e.g. the Chinese Exclusion Acts, the Japanese-American internment during WWII, explicit campaigns to drive Asians out of the American West, the lynching of Asian Americans. (Which is something that is not commonly known due to the fact that many Asian and Mexican victims of mob violence in the 19th c. were classified as ‘White’ in official records*)

2) It ignores the history of White European imperialism in Asian countries, which intersects with White racism against Asian immigrants in White-majority countries. I assure you that White imperialists certainly did not view Indians, Chinese, or Vietnamese as being anything other than ‘Colored’

Imperial map of Asia, source of map

White European man receiving a pedicure from South Asian servants

3) It plays into the White racist divide-and-conquer strategy.

Even a brief look at the history of race/ethnicity in U.S. law alone makes it apparent that a key aspect of White racism has been the classification of non-Whites according to (white-defined) categories.

Those hailing from Asia (as well as the Middle East, the Caribbean, and Latin America) have been legally categorized in a myriad of ways—very occasionally as White, but more often as non-White (e.g. Ozawa v. United States, United States v. Thind). In general, Asians have occupied a strange ethno-racial limbo as ‘Other’ (e.g. the Census prior to 1870). As far as Whites were concerned, Asians might not have been ‘Negros’, but we certainly weren’t White either. Our otherness made us targets for discrimination and violence, and—because our right to citizenship has constantly come under attack—we’ve historically had as little recourse to the protection of the law as African Americans have.

Massacre of the Chinese at White Springs, Wyoming (source)

Yes, Asian people have (somewhat more recently than you think) enjoyed certain perks due to our ethnicity/race compared to Black and AmerIndian people (e.g. ‘the model minority’). But that’s just a more recent aspect of the divide-and-conquer strategy, which the White hegemony has used to pit minorities against each other so as to distract us from the real problems facing our communities.

And yes, some Asian people are complete racist dicks to those who aren’t Asian or White, but that’s internalized White racism. If you’ve been kicked and beaten by your master for years, then suddenly given a few scraps from his table, would you throw them in his face? Or is it more likely that—as beaten down as you are—you’d give in to Stockholm Syndrome and play along? (To be clear: that’s an explanation for Asian racism, not an excuse.)

Even so, incidents of Anti-Asian bias (e.g. Vincent Chin, Wen Ho Lee) and straight-up racist violence occur frequently enough these days that Asians are hyper-aware of the fact that many—including non-whites—don’t view us as Americans, let alone ‘Colored’. We’re simply foreign ‘others’.

So if White is grudgingly treating you OK, while Black and Brown seem to hate and distrust you, then whom do you ally yourself with? More importantly, who benefits from this apparent alliance?

In the American black-white paradigm of race relations, ‘others’ like Asians get shit on no matter which side we’re on. So the Asian internalization of White racism makes a twisted kind of sense as a survival strategy, particularly if your natural allies (other victims of White racism) are treating you like foreigners and even equating you with the oppressor himself. 

My point: Asians’ conflicted, sometimes tense, relations with African Americans and those who have been historically, categorically considered ‘Colored’ is an artifact of White racism. This means that if you exclude Asians from ‘Colored’ solidarity against White racism, you are reproducing a highly successful strategy of White racism.

Let that sink in for a minute.

To conclude: Anti-Asian exclusion from POC solidarity movements is ignorant, wrong, and just plain stupid. Asians’s current role as a prop of White racial supremacy is not our doing, just as our historic role as the foreign ‘Other’ is not our doing. The peculiar place of Asians in race relations today has been the result of the intersection of White racism, xenophobia, and imperialism. It is a mistake to think otherwise.  

TL;DR: Questioning the identity of Asians as “people of color” reinforces White racial supremacy.

theredwhiteandnews:

Muslim groups are planning on disrupting the moment of silence outside the US Embassy in London on the 10 year anniversary of 9/11.

Okay, let’s start correcting you right here. 

It’s “group”, not groups.

Singular.

The main stream media won’t tell you or show you that. Since Islam is a religion of peace, right? That is the message that’s been brainwashed into Americans. I never bought it and I am pretty sure the non-liberal Americans never bought it either. Everyone is just too Politically Correct to say anything. Wouldn’t want to insult your liberal friends now, would you? Too afraid of offending the Muslim people?

Acctually…. 
There are a “lot” of people who agree with you.
They tend to speak against “all” muslims, regardless of who they are as individuals. 

You see, the media makes it seem like it’s bad to be a conservative and that conservatives are in the minority.

In theory, being conservative isn’t bad, if you’re striving to conserve good things… but that’s not always the case.

They attempt to paint Christianity as a moronic cult.

Actually, a lot of Christians do seem like mindless cultists in their following of the word of groups like focus on the family and other “hate” groups. 

Also, how are you not doing what you accuse them of??

Want to be judged as a human being and an individual for “your” actions and not be presumed to be, well, just like the Norwegian, white, Christian terrorist? How ‘bout you extend the same curtsy to others around you, regardless of their colour or creed. 

They attempt to make white conservatives look like racists.

Maybe, but you know what, all the racists I’ve ran into in my lifetime were white, Christian and conservative. 

‘Course,… that’s hardly science, but… There is a trend.

When in actuality, all conservatives want is to protect our country, freedom and constitution.

Two words: Patriot act.

I was going to say, lets see these groups come protest in NYC on 9/11…but sadly, I don’t think anyone would have the courage to stand up to them. 

Again. 
Group.
Singular.

And, you know what…
This is an “extremist” group.
With very few members.
That those muslims that I know and have commented on their existence tends to go “ugh” in response.

I mean, you yelling ‘bout them and using them to judge all muslims is a little bit like if I were to yell about Westboro Baptist Church and start judging all of christianity for the actions of Westboro Baptist Church.